The framework
Every agent is graded twice
Two scores, assigned independently. Collapsing them into one judgment — is this legitimate? — is the central error in this field.
Gate one · Evidence
- E1
- Approved indication, randomized evidence
- E2
- Meaningful human evidence — off-label, other population, or foreign approval
- E3
- Early or unreplicated human data
- E4
- Preclinical or mechanistic only
Gate two · Access
- A1
- Approved and commercially available for this use
- A2
- Approved product, off-label use
- A3
- Lawful compounding pathway exists
- A4
- No lawful US pathway today
The two axes are independent. Kisspeptin has good randomized human data and no lawful route to a patient (E2/A4). A gray-market repair peptide has neither (E4/A4). Tesamorelin used outside HIV lipodystrophy has real trial evidence and a lawful off-label route (E2/A2). Collapsing these into one judgment — 'is this legitimate?' — is the central error in this field, and separating them is the most useful habit this program will give you.
The grades are published. All of them.
Sixty agents, graded per indication — the same molecule can carry six different rows. Free to read, no account. Here is a fair sample, not a flattering one:
| Agent | Graded for | Grade | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide | obesity | Evidence tier 1, access tier 1 — graded as clearing both gates | August 2026 |
| Tesamorelin | body composition, non-HIV | Evidence tier 2, access tier 2 — graded as clearing both gates | August 2026 |
| Kisspeptin | hypoactive sexual desire | Evidence tier 2, access tier 4 — graded as not clearing both gates | August 2026 |
| Topical GHK-Cu | photoaging (cosmetic) | Evidence tier 3, access tier 1 — graded as not clearing both gates | August 2026 |
| BPC-157 | tissue repair | Evidence tier 4, access tier 4 — graded as not clearing both gates | August 2026 |
| Melanotan II | tanning, libido | Evidence tier 4, access tier 4 — graded as not clearing both gates | August 2026 |
Why this exists
The gap this was built to fill
Much of the peptide education available to physicians reaches them through channels with a commercial stake in what gets prescribed. Two Gates has none: no relationship with any peptide seller, compounder or pharmacy. Nothing here is sold but the teaching — which is why the grades can afford to be published, and why half of them are unflattering.
You will find the evidence here graded honestly, including where the honest grade is unflattering to something you may already be prescribing.
Three programs
Applied Peptide Therapeutics
Three tiers, foundations to capstone
Seven modules · 28 hours · Eight weeks · Two live case sessions
GLP-1 Therapeutics
The incretins, after the outcome trials
Six modules · 8 hours · Self-paced · For licensed MDs and DOs
Peptide Therapy & BHRT
Twenty sessions built around recall
Twenty sessions · Four weeks · Self-paced
Enrollment is currently by inquiry
Tell us what you practice and what you are trying to get right, and the course director will reply. No mailing list, and your details go nowhere else.
Inquire about a program